Key strengths and issues arising from student performance.
Including any actions taken from last year;
Students worked very well on a case study which required
planning designing and evaluating elements revolving round a
medical supplier. Results show that students worked well in
teams employing relevant software to construct very usable
products, with very effective design and builds which were
evaluated thoroughly and clearly using task based procedures.
This, in conjunction with an individual element, produced a good
overall mean result of 59% with a significant number achieving
above 70%. Work was also presented and demonstrated very
well indeed. A minority did not focus on some task based design
aspects clearly enough. Usability testing procedures were
refined this year in line with action plan and students focused
well on this area of user-centred evaluation. Generally, work
was of a very high standard particularly in usability testing
areas. |