Here are the guidelines for what we're looking for at this third stage. This time, the guidelines are not Commons-specific, but are a set widely used for evaluating teaching portfolios. (Those of you involved in the trans-oceanic review will also be using these same guidelines - I'll be in contact about that separately). You may be interested in where these guidelines come from, and the other interesting materials the Peer Review of Teaching Project has generated.

As usual, make sure you do your review before you come to the Commons in May, as there'll be time dedicated to individual feedback and discussion (and I'll try and ensure there's enough time this time).

• selection/inclusion criteria for our content, and
• thinking about production values - What do they look like? How easy are they to read/navigate?

Have a browse of some other portfolios, to gather some good ideas beforehand. Bring the URL of any you particularly like.