This month, we’ll be doing our third round of peer-review. Check out whose work you are reviewing from the peer-review pairs document.
Guidelines for what we’re looking for at this third stageare in the password-protected section of the website, and attached here. This time, the guidelines are not Commons-specific, but are a set widely used for evaluating teaching portfolios. You may be interested in where these guidelines come from, and other materials the Peer Review of Teaching Project has generated. See: http://www.courseportfolios.org
As usual, make sure you do your review before you come to the Commons in May, as there’ll be time dedicated to individual feedback and discussion.
As we near “complete first draft” stage, during the May session we’ll be taking a more holistic view of the portfolios, talking about:
Have a browse of some other portfolios, to gather some good ideas beforehand. Bring the URL of any you particularly like